Talk:Flower

A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flower article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 months

Flower is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Flower has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 31, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
May 1, 2025	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Non-angiosperms in main image

The article's main image contains 4 images of non-flowers: reproductive structures of Picea abies, Pinus pinaster, Equisetum arvense, and Cycas revoluta, none of which are flowering plants. 171.66.12.183 (talk) 22:18, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted - that's been fixed now. Junglenut |Talk 23:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 January 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

"I Bet Your Mother Would Be Proud Of You"- Frank Ocean.... WhoBeKnockingOnTheirDoor (talk) 17:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Your request doesn't seem to be relevant, provided the page. If I am misunderstanding, feel free to reply with a more specific proposition. Urropean (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that a sunflower is not a flower?

Source: https://archive.org/details/james-d.-mauseth-botany-an-introduction-to-plant-biology-2017-jones-bartlett-learning-libgen.li/page/227/mode/2up

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/December 2011 Christchurch earthquakes

Improved to Good Article status by Dracophyllum (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

Draco phyllum 05:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Another cheeky one; a sunflower is actually an inflorescence or group of many flowers. Draco phyllum 05:14, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Recent GA article checks out on sourcing, length, copyvio, etc. Next stop featured article? @Dracophyllum: It would be nice to include a photo, the sunflower in the gallery at the top of the page is very eye-catching. BuySomeApples (talk) 06:16, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, if the prep makers would like, the following is a nice image. Draco phyllum 06:21, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Flower

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

Listing this because I've been encouraged by some editors to get it through FAC. Not sure if I have it in me, given my only other FA is a super niche plant. But if I do submit it, I figured this would be a good place to start.

Thanks, Draco phyllum 06:24, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]